Julius Caesar s desired conquest to take power caused him to expand the Roman Empire this makes him a good leader because hes taking action. Even before Caesar became sole ruler of Rome he was no stranger to taking dangerous political risks.
Caesar was a capable soldier and he received the highest award for bravery in the Roman Republic because of his role in a siege in modern Turkey.
Why was julius caesar a good leader. Considering this why was Julius Caesar a great military leader. Caesar was a capable soldier and he received the highest award for bravery in the Roman Republic because of his role in a siege in modern Turkey. On one occasion he was captured by some pirates and after he was ransomed he returned and seized his former captors and crucified them after all.
Julius Caesar s desired conquest to take power caused him to expand the Roman Empire this makes him a good leader because hes taking action. He wouldnt want people to control him he would want to control them. Caesars conquest of Gaul resulted in him becoming governor.
How many times did he lose battle out of his nine years there. View this answer The word good is a subjective term for evaluating people so to be more precise Julius Caesar was a capable and effective leader. Caesar the Good Leader One of the earliest examples of Caesar as a good leader comes from his early life.
Julius Caesar was born into a. Julius Caesar was a successful leader because he knew how to manage his power and popularity he handled foreign policy very well and he knew how to show his strengths. Julius Caesar was exceptional at managing people and steering things to go his way.
Caesar was raised as a patrician but his family was not wealthy especially because. Although he became the sole dictator of Rome in 46 BCE Julius Caesar was a good leader rather than a tyrant. He expanded the Roman empire increased Romes prestige and provided for the.
I am so glad to get distinction Was Julius Caesar A Good Leader Ess in my assignment. Thank you so much myassignmenthelp. You are one of the best services I Was Julius Caesar A Good Leader Ess came across and your writers are extremely good.
I am very happy to get such a good quality of service. Effective response from support team. Request a Call.
In Julius Caesar Mark Antony is a perfect example of a good leader. Not only is he a confident and noble person he is also persuasive and that helps in becoming a good leader. Antony would be a good leader of Rome because he is confident noble and persuasive.
This text is NOT unique. Julius Caesar as many other politicians and soldiers in Roman times was also a good orator. He used to show up impeccably dressed at the Roman Senate and addressed his soldiers with vehement speeches.
A good leader cares about learning communication techniques that will help him correctly convey messages and engage the team. There are simulators to improve these skills. I have researched many good reasons why Julius Caesar was a good leader but There will be three factors that stood out to me that are qualities and abilities that are needed in a leader the main three that will be used are Julius Caesar was the greatest politician of his time Julius Caesar was the best general of his time and finally Julius Caesar respected his man.
The answer to the Question I asked earlier is. Caesar is the main leader in the play even though he dies quite early. When he dies the Elizabethan audience would not feel sorry for him because of the way his character is presented in the play as an arrogant leader and he is over ambitious.
Brutus would besides be a good leader because he is non the type of individual that would sit around and watch the authorities travel bad if he saw a job he would seek his best to repair it. Brutus would besides do a good swayer because he is willing to contend for what he thinks is right. Brutus says Let us be sacrificers but non meatmans Caius This quotation mark shows how Brutus does non wish to kill Caesar.
Even before Caesar became sole ruler of Rome he was no stranger to taking dangerous political risks. In 51 BC Caesar defied senate authority and longstanding military tradition when he crossed the Rubicon River to take on his political opponent Pompey Magnus. Such a move signaled a treasonous invasion of his own country.
If Julius Caesar had not been assassinated the Republic would probably still have collapsed just in another generation or two and there would be different emperors. Julius Caesar did not set out to make himself king or emperor and in fact was about to leave Rome for an expedition against the Parthians. There was a chance he would never return from this expedition so this and many other things lead.
It seems unlikely that Brutus is totally lacking in political ambition but he joins Cassius and the conspirators against Caesar for apparently noble reasons. Brutus believes that Cassius shares.